This page includes policies and procedures that have the most impact on University purchases. Additional information can be found in the Procurement Procedure Manual.

Procurement Standards

The effective date for implementation of Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Procurement Standards regulations at the Iowa State University was in fiscal year 2019 (FY19) which began July 1, 2018. The University continued to follow the Procurement Standards regulations as specified in OMB Circular A-110, 2 CRF Part 215 through June 30, 2018, as provided in the November 2014 COFAR Frequently Asked Questions and updated in the Federal Register 9/10/15 universal identifier and system of award management corrections. Iowa State began utilizing the micro-purchase threshold of $50,000 on July 1, 2018.

Bidding Process - Using a Request for Quotation or Using a Request for Proposal

When preparing to purchase equipment, supplies, or services, thought should be given to the request that will be sent to suppliers. At ISU, pricing is requested by either direct bidding based on known equipment specifications and performance (Request for Quotation or RFQ) or by stating performance criteria and inviting suppliers to propose equipment, systems, or services to achieve the desired level of performance (Request for Proposal or RFP).

As a general rule, equipment should be bid using an RFQ if there is a particular item or system on the market that will meet your requirements. Proposals should be requested if you are uncertain whether there is an item or system available to produce the results you hope to obtain.

A Request for Proposal is the most flexible way for requesting bids. Because a proposal is result driven, it allows the end user(s) to consider a variety of bid solutions for a given situation.

Feel free to discuss your needs with a procurement agent, who can help you determine the best process for a particular acquisition.

 

Bid Specifications and Requirements for Quotations and for Proposals

Perhaps the most important aspect of purchasing in a public institution is the development of product/service specifications for bidding. The Iowa Board of Regents and Federal Government both require fair and open competition based on generic specifications. Careful formulation of bid specifications will help ensure that offered items meet your needs. Bids not meeting your requirements can be rejected if the original specifications were objective and based on the necessary function and performance of the items or services desired. The Procurement Services Department encourages faculty and staff involvement in preparing bid specifications. 

Bid Overview

When preparing specifications, it is helpful to begin with a brief statement describing how the goods or services will be used. This allows suppliers to provide an offering more suited to your requirements and can be of assistance should the products or services later prove unsatisfactory.

Specifications

Specifications for goods should be based on the functional or technical performance of the products. Considerations such as:

  • Uniformity
  • Resolution
  • Durability
  • Power Output
  • Reliability
  • Processor speed
  • Sensitivity
  • Ability to Run a Specific Software
  • Stability
  • Ability to Perform Desired Task
  • Expansion Capability
  • Methodology

Specifications for services should be based on your needs with a detailed outline of how you expect the services to be performed, with specific timelines and performance benchmarks clearly defined for each time period.

Proprietary features must not be included in the specifications unless your required use is dependent upon performance derived from such features.

As a public institution, we must avoid making specifications too restrictive and, thus, preventing competition. Features, which do not have a direct bearing on the product’s performance as it relates to your intended use, should not be included. If your specifications are too "tight", you may find that a product, which is able to meet your functional requirements and is less costly, may have to be rejected for not meeting specifications. In this case, your requirements may need to be rebid with revised specifications. Bid documents are considered to be legal offers to buy. If a supplier should suspect that specifications have been written expressly to eliminate his or her products from consideration, that supplier may elect to protest the bid or the resultant award.

Performance/Testing Statement

Specifications should conclude with a brief statement of the expected performance of the products. This may also be stated as a formal performance test. Test results may be required as a submittal with the supplier's bid response and used as an evaluation criteria. A required performance standard may need to be demonstrated before the product is accepted and payment is made.

Developing specifications for proposals is somewhat different than the process listed above. When preparing the requirements for a request for proposal, the required performance must be clearly defined. Suppliers are free to propose alternate products or services that will meet required performance standards. Submission of test data or product samples may be required as part of your specifications. Data may be from samples, which suppliers submit as part of the proposal process, or be the results of tests performed on known standards.

For specialized purchases, multiple award criteria may also be specified. ISU's basic criteria include such considerations as the ability to meet functional specifications, cost, references, warranty, and delivery. Additional criteria can be added to meet specific needs and help in the selection of compliant products.

Bid Limits

ValueClassificationMinimum Bid Requirements
$1 - $25,000Supplies and EquipmentOrders may be processed based on estimated cost. Quotes from at least one supplier may be prudent.
$25,001 - $49,99Supplies and EquipmentRequires an informal bidding process to be performed by Procurement Services. This may entail receiving several quotes or a bid process.
$5,000 - $25,000EquipmentProcurement agent's discretion is utilized to determine pricing method and need for competitive bidding. Any equipment purchase requires a minimum of one offer or quote be obtained to establish fixed pricing.
$50,000 and above Supplies and EquipmentRequires formal competitive bidding process be followed

* Competitions from an adequate number of sources or some price reasonableness evaluation may be performed and documented to ensure ISU is paying a reasonable price especially when federal funding at any level is being utilized.  Competition or quotes is the preferred method

** Equipment with a unit cost greater than $1,000,000 and less than $2,000,000 will be submitted to the Board Office COO for approval. Equipment costing more than $2,000,000 will be submitted to the Board COO for approval and at the discretion of the COO may be submitted to the full Board for approval.

Bids $50,000 and above generally are issued for a minimum of 14 days. Formal sealed bids (complex projects or price only criteria) generally are issued for at least 30 days. Bid solicitations may be issued for longer than the period indicated, should the situation warrant.

Federal grant recipients may be required to utilize federal small businesses for some items purchased on the grant. In some cases, federal procurement practices will differ from those of the University. For more information concerning purchasing on a federal grant or contract, please contact Sponsored Programs Accounting (294-4569) or the Procurement Services Department (294-4860).

The Conflict of Interest Policy contained in the ISU Policy Library explains the University's position regarding purchasing goods or services from employees. 

For more information on Conflict of Interest as it relates to state employees, see Iowa Code Section 68B Conflicts of interest. 

  • Federal Standards: The Federal Government employs a higher standard related to conflicts of interest which may affect ISU employees purchasing goods and services with federal grant or contract funds. The Federal Government also states that even the appearance of impropriety is to be avoided. The following section from the Code of Federal Regulation 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements deals with conflicts of interest. 
  • Codes of Conduct: The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity. 

    If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.

ISU has established the Conflict of Interest Procurement Committee (COIPC) to review purchases from potential conflicts of interest. These conflicts arise when the company we are transacting business with is owned wholly or partially by an ISU employee, an employee of a regent institution or an employee of a state agency. 
 

For a complete listing of purchasing guidelines when using federal funding refer to the PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS

  • Many of the narcotics, depressants, and stimulants manufactured for legitimate medical use are subject to abuse and have, therefore, been brought under legal control. Under federal law, all businesses that import, export, manufacture, or distribute controlled substances; all health professionals licensed to dispense, administer, or prescribe them; and all pharmacies authorized to fill prescriptions must register with the DEA.

The institutional license issued to Iowa State University for academic instruction may no longer be used. The laws and regulations governing controlled substances have changed over time, making this option no longer available.

An individual must normally maintain separate licenses for materials used in private practice and university-sponsored research. Iowa State University personnel who wish to obtain controlled substances for use in university-sponsored research must register with the DEA.

  • Individuals requiring controlled substances for research must provide a valid and active state license in order to complete the DEA registration. 
  • Orders placed for controlled substances will only be delivered to the address listed on the DEA registration certificate. 
  • The controlled substance must be used at the physical address listed on the registration. 
  • Individuals placing orders for research use will need to utilize a web requisition to process the order, but the delivery will be made to the address listed on the DEA Registration.  If the order is placed via cyBUY, the distributing vendor will contact the requestor directly to obtain their DEA registration number. 

Application Process for Researcher CSA/DEA

STEP 1

Applications for Researchers can be obtained by completing the controlled substances registration application Controlled Substance Act (CSA) registration. Complete all required information, sign and return the application to the Iowa Board of Pharmacy Board office with a check or money order in the amount of $90.  The application must indicate an Iowa practice address, including the street address.  You will be registered for those schedules indicated on the application form.  If you wish to use controlled substances in all schedules (2, 2N, 3, 3N, 4, 5) be certain to indicate this by checking each respective schedule on the application. (Refer to "Summary of Drugs and Schedules")  The Iowa professional license is required before either the state or federal controlled substance registration will be issued.

Common questions asked about completing the form for New Applications are below: 

  • What do I enter for Iowa CSA Registration No.:  Enter as N/A
  • What do I enter in Section #2, Licensure Information?
    • Type of Practitioner: Researcher
    • Specialty:  Can be left blank
    • Iowa Professional License #: If applicable, may enter veterinary or medical license number
    • Federal DEA #?  Enter N/A
  • Do I need to attach anything with my application?  Researchers must attach a copy of their research protocol with their application.
    • Title of Project
    • Statement of the Purpose
    • Name of controlled substance (cs) involved, amount (with justification) of each needed and source, a detailed description of procedures (including number and species of research subjects, dosage to be administered, route and method of administration and duration of project.)
    • Approving Authority if applicable (IRB, IACUC, IBC)
  • How do I pay for my CSA license?  Payment can be made on Supplier Invoice (non-PO) in Workday.  To route the check to a specific person for mailing, enter “Hand Deliver” in the Handling Code on the supplier invoice, then, in the Memo field, enter the person’s name and campus address to whom the check should be sent.  For questions about the payment process, please contact Finance Service Delivery (finance_delivery@iastate.edu) or Matt Devick (mdevick@iastate.edu, 515-294-0457) in the Controller’s Department. 

Questions about the CSA form or application process can be directed to Sharon Smith (Sharon.smith@iowa.gov or 515-725-3487) at the Iowa Board of Pharmacy Examiners.

STEP 2

Obtain your federal registration application (Form DEA-224, or DEA-225) available at: https://apps.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/webforms/jsp/regapps/common/newAppLogin.jsp (This can be paid by pcard).  Follow the instructions on the online form.  The DEA registration will not be issued before the state registration application has been processed.

STEP 3

Individuals who have made controlled substance procurements are required to inventory such controlled substances. The DEA requires that all controlled substances be stored in a secured area, and that access be limited to the DEA license holder.

Current Drug Schedule:

The current listing of all controlled substances is available on the US Drug Enforcement Administration website at: https://www.dea.gov/drug-scheduling Derivatives of such chemicals, drugs, or components of various chemicals, or drugs are also considered controlled substances.

Disposal of unused Controlled Substances: 

  • Registrant must first attempt to return unused material to the manufacturer (called, “reverse distribution”) for proper disposal. 
  • Registrant must contact EH&S for disposal guidance if reverse distribution is not available. 
  • Other DEA Information:  https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drug_disposal/index.html

Resources for additional information:

Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA):  https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/

DEA Forms and Tools:  https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/online_forms_apps.html

New DEA Applications:  https://apps.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/webforms/jsp/regapps/common/newAppLogin.jsp

Renew DEA Registration:  https://apps.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/webforms/jsp/regapps/common/renewalAppLogin.jsp

The Board of Regents has acknowledged that there are occasions when products or services must be purchased from one specific source or manufacturer. If a request is made to purchase a product or service from only one supplier, yet several sources can provide a similar product, the request will be subject to the normal bid process. Should you request that products or services be purchased on a sole source basis, it must meet one of the criteria shown below. You must provide a written explanation, commonly referred to as a "sole source justification", to support your request. Use the Sole Source Request Form to submit your request.  The four most commonly accepted sole source justifications are outlined below.

  1. Compatibility with existing equipment
    This justification may be used if your products or services are being purchased to directly interface with or attach to equipment of the same manufacturer, and no other manufacturer's products will correctly interface with existing equipment.
  2. Compatibility for instructional purposes
    This justification may be used if the products are being purchased to supplement existing equipment in a classroom. The product must exactly match the existing equipment and is being purchased to provide uniformity for instructional purposes.
  3. Compatibility for research
    This justification may be used if the main purpose for acquiring equipment or supplies is to replicate specific experiments, using the exact products that produced the original results. You may also use this justification if you are collaborating with another researcher and can show that identical products are required to fulfill your part of the agreement.
  4. Only one supplier can be identified to supply a compliant product or service or only one supplier is uniquely qualified to provide the product or service
    In rare cases, only one supplier may exist to provide a particular product or service. When providing a justification based on the availability of one supplier, the product or service must be defined in generic terms. Specifying patented products or processes, when not necessary to meet functional requirements, is not acceptable as a sole source justification. Alternatively, only one supplier may be identified as being uniquely qualified or having specific experience and expertise to provide the product or services.  The justification must describe why the supplier is uniquely qualified.

To request a sole source, use the Sole Source Request Form and email to Procurement Services at procurement@iastate.edu or include as an attachment on a non-catalog requisition in Workday.  The form can also be completed through Adobe Sign, the document will route automatically to the Director of Procurement for review.  Once fully signed, you will receive an email with the signed document from Adobe.

Final determination as to whether products/services will be purchased on a sole source basis will be made by the Procurement Services Department, in consultation with the requester. Your sole source documentation will remain on file as part of the official procurement documents and may be subject to audit or review by interested parties.

For requests that are using federal funds and exceed $50,000, only the following sole source reasons may be used as justification:

  • The item is only available from a single source (and can be documented as such. This does not mean only one source can sell a particular brand or style but that no other source for the item required can be identified even through a bid process.)
  • The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation;
  • The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or
  • After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.

The requester must write the justification in their own words.  Sole source justifications that are written by a supplier may be provided as additional documentation only.      

See also: Competitive Procurement